After negotiation, intergovernmental pacts must be approved by legislators in your affiliated states. [10] A pact is approved by a state legislator in accordance with its procedure for enacting legislation and becomes the status of the state. [11] If approved by the legislature, the governor of a state still has the power to veto a pact if the governor so decides (subject to the legislature`s ability to strike a veto by a new vote). [12] Representatives of states negotiating a pact are well advised to ensure that their respective legislators are informed of the progress of negotiations and the resolution of issues and are familiar with them; Otherwise, a legislator may refuse to approve a pact as presented and request a renegotiation of questions before its approval is granted. [13] In the United States, executive agreements are concluded exclusively by the President of the United States. They are one of three mechanisms through which the United States makes binding international commitments. Some authors view executive agreements as treaties of international law because they bind both the United States and another sovereign state. However, under U.S. constitutional law, executive agreements are not considered treaties within the meaning of the contractual clause of the U.S.
Constitution, which requires the Council and the approval of two-thirds of the Senate to be considered a treaty. While intergovernmental pacts are binding treaties between the states that are part of them, pacts approved by Congress also become federal law. The Supreme Court ruled that a border between states, agreed in an intergovernmental pact approved by Congress, “is binding and ultimately settles the border between them [] and with the same effect as a treaty between sovereign powers.” [21] In Cuyler v. Adams, the Court of Justice, when Congress approved an intergovernmental pact and that “the purpose of this agreement is an appropriate subject for congressional legislation, congressional approval turns the state agreement into federal law, in accordance with the compact clause.” [22] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has clarified that pacts approved by Congress, which do not threaten the supremacy of the federal state but address matters suitable for congressional legislation, still become a federal right, although such approval has not been required. [23] According to the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court is originally responsible for resolving interstate disputes[24] and the Court will apply intergovernmental covenants in accordance with the principles of contract law. [25] Executive agreements are often used to circumvent the requirements of national constitutions for treaty ratification.
Comments are closed.